A dismissed employee sues his firm for anti-union discrimination.
Issues
Because of this visibly marginalized employee's penchant for quibbling about regulations, our client - in spite of the conciliatory attitude that it has so far demonstrated - is in danger of being convicted of unfair dismissal, anti-union discrimination, and psychological harassment.Solution
After a detailed study of the situation, our office ensures the legal dependability of the dismissal procedure, the only way out of this impasse. To provide support for the grounds of this dismissal, we request an inquiry by the CHCST (Committee on Health, Safety, and Working Conditions), to provide a record of the employee's behavior.Results
The CHSCT's report highlights the inability of the employee to work as a member of a team, combined with occupational inadequacies.Our client's situation is at last cleared up. We are confident that this dismissal can be justified before the Labor Court which, for lack of proof from the opposing party, cannot accept accusations of anti-union discrimination or psychological harassment.
